
š From URS to Arbitration: MFSDās Proposals for the Next Generation of ICANN Rights Protection Mechanisms
Updated: Aug 28
by Cooling Off Reviewās Editorial Staff
MFSD has submitted its Public Comment on ICANNās proposed implementation of the IGO/INGO Curative Rights Policy Recommendations, approaching the consultation from the operational perspective of an ICANN-approved URS Provider.
The submission focuses on five priorities:
preserving the speed and simplicity of the URS,
promoting consistent implementation across Providers,
creating an effective operational interface between URS proceedings and arbitration,
establishing transparent standards for ICANN-designated arbitral institutions, and
developing ongoing coordination among ICANN org, Providers, arbitral institutions, Registrars, and Registry Operators.
MFSD also proposes a ProviderāArbitral Institution Operational Protocol (PAIOP)Ā and invites ICANN to clarify whether an existing URS Provider could qualify as an arbitral institution, subject to appropriate functional separation and conflict-of-interest safeguards.
The broader objective is a more integrated, interoperable, and resilient dispute resolution architectureĀ within ICANNās Rights Protection Mechanisms.
Read MFSDās Public Comment: https://www.icann.org/en/public-comment/proceeding/proposed-implementation-of-the-igo-ingo-curative-rights-policy-recommendations-30-06-2026/submissions/mfsd--10-08-2026




Comments